University of Rijeka

Sveučilište u Rijeci

Basic information

National External Quality Assurance Requirements

  • Extraordinary evaluation
    the evaluation of one or more areas of activity of a higher education institution
  • Thematic evaluation
    assesses similar types of subjects of evaluation or areas of activity of one or more such subjects of evaluation
  • Initial accreditation of programmes
    all new study programmes; in case of any substantial modification of an existing study programme
  • Initial accreditation of higher education institutions
    all new higher education institutions; in case of a status change of a higher education institution
  • Re-accreditation of higher education institutions
    all public and private higher education institutions in five-year cycles
  • Further information on external quality assurance in Croatia

External Quality Assurance Reports and Decisions

Filter reports

Clear all
Search programmes

Institutional level

This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Maritime Studies
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Civil Engineering
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Engineering
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Law
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Department of Mathematics
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Department of Informatics
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Medicine
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Department of Physics
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Department of Biotechnology
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Economics
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Engineering
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Economics
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Institutional audit, Faculty of Engineering
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Institutional audit, Faculty of Civil Engineering
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Institutional audit
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive with conditions or restrictions
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Teacher Education
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Civil Engineering
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

Programme level

This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Pshyhology (third cycle degree)
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Strojarstvo, brodogradnja i temeljne tehničke znanosti (third cycle degree)
  • Offered by
  • Qualification/award
    • Doktor znanosti/umjetnosti
  • Level
    third cycle (NQF level 8)
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Urban Sustainability Studies (first cycle degree, 180 ECTS)
  • Offered by
  • Qualification/award
    • Bachelor of Science, Bachelor of Science
  • Level
    first cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • Workload (in ECTS credits)
    180

Verifiable Credentials

A Verifiable Credential (VC) is a digitally-signed and thus tamper-evident document containing information on a subject (e.g. personal information, entitlements of an individual, degrees held by an individual or accreditation of a higher education institution). Quality assurance results recorded in DEQAR can be downloaded as W3C-compatible Verifiable Credentials.

Currently, two types of credentials can be issued:

EBSI Verifiable Accreditations (VA) can be used by a higher education institution in the context of the EBSI Early Adopters programme.

  • The VA allows the institution to prove its external quality assurance on the Trusted Issuer Registry (TIR). EBSI VAs are only issued for external quality assurance results with an official status in a national system (“part of obligatory EQA system”).
  • At present, the higher education institution’s EBSI DID needs to be communicated to EQAR and recorded in DEQAR manually at the moment. If you are a higher education institution participating in EBSI, please contact us to register your DID.
  • EBSI VAs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:ebsi:zk4bhCepWSYp9RhZkRPiwUL.

DEQAR Format Verifiable Credentials primarily serve as a proof of concept and public demonstrator currently.

  • DEQAR Format VCs are based on the plain W3C Recommendation and our own data model. While they closely follow the EBSI Schema, no EBSI-specific or EU-specific elements or data types are used.
  • The higher education institution is identified by its DEQAR URI in this case.
  • DEQAR Format VCs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:web:data.deqar.eu.

Please note: this is an experimental feature.