The institution regularly and appropriately evaluates and updates the content, composition and implementation of all study programs that have been the subject of external evaluation. In this way, it continuously develops programs and maintains their relevance. A large amount of data collected contributes to this, with a well-developed information infrastructure being of great help. Stakeholders are properly involved in the self-evaluation process and are informed about the results in an appropriate way, but an even more proactive stakeholder approach would be useful. All data collected indicate the existence and effective functioning of the quality circle. Despite the adaptations, the programs are complete in terms of content and composition, and the contents are connected along the horizontal and vertical axes. In all programs, the institution takes care of the compliance of the objectives and competencies of the syllabus with the basic objectives and competencies of the study program. However, greater differentiation is needed between the two study programs at the first level of study. The institution is implementing a number of projects, but more attention should be paid to more prestigious international research programs. Teaching methods are adapted to different groups of students and higher 54 education teachers. The number of contact hours performed is appropriate. The work and involvement of students in scientific, professional, research projects is appropriate and varies according to the level of study. Practical education is properly organized and implemented, to the satisfaction of both students and mentors. Informing of students is timely and effective. All higher education teachers involved in the implementation of the study programes have relevant references and habilitation. The programs are implemented within the appropriate infrastructure. However, we would suggest hiring a librarian with a library education who will be able to provide a more appropriate service to very different groups of users. The institution effectively ensures the protection of the rights of stakeholders in the study process. It enables employees to enjoy academic autonomy and develop their career path. Stakeholders are duly informed.