At the Faculty of Administration, the evaluated study programs are developed and updated in a constant communication among employees, students, management and external stakeholders. Both of the evaluated study programs have an international accreditation, which has led to the modernization of both study programs. At the first cycle study program a new module Governance in the European Union was introduced, and the second cycle study program was fully renewed in line with the recommendations of international accreditation, opinions of more than 1000 potential employers and with an active involvement of the academic staff and students. Students have expressed satisfaction with their studies. According to the employers, graduates possess a broad view of public administration and are highly flexible. Academic and non-teaching staff are suitably qualified and receive an adequate assistance and advice regarding their professional development. The material conditions for the implementation of the two study programs are appropriate. For students with special needs, appropriate adjustments are made to enable them to study successfully and progress regularly. Both management and employees have recognized the importance of innovative approaches to teaching and to student-centered teaching and learning. The Centre for the Development of Pedagogical Excellence is the driving force of this development. The 27 integration of innovative teaching methods is stimulated by the faculty both financially and by habilitation criteria, where points collected on the basis of training for pedagogical work are also required for each promotion. The group of experts suggests that the faculty reconsiders the enrolment conditions for the second cycle study program and defines appropriate differential exams for students from other fields on the topics that are a prerequisite for their successful study. The faculty should also follow the amount of student workload and take measures when discrepancies are identified. The faculty still has many opportunities to improve in the field of self-evaluation reports and reporting on what it is actually being done for the quality development, as quite a few analyses, evaluations and proposals for improvement are missing in the self-evaluation reports. In this respect, the team of experts has tried to give specific suggestions in order to help the faculty in the further development of the system and culture of quality.