In the evaluation process of the sample of study programs of the institution, we evaluated the study programs Business Informatics (higher education study program) and Management and Informatics (master study program). The study programs were evaluated according to the five standards of Article 23 of the Criteria. For four standards, we identified advantages, such as the fact that within the self-evaluation of study programs, the institution conducts two-year interviews with a focus group of students and graduates; the implementation of the study program is fully adapted to the needs of the part-time student population; student-centered education, both in terms of the way the pedagogical process is carried out and in terms of support services for students, is assessed as very positive; the possibility of obtaining certificates for students and additional courses; a well-designed interactive online classroom, which in addition to study materials also contains news about the activities of the Student Council and a forum through which up-to-date communication between school, teachers and students and a workshop on writing and using learning outcomes for higher education teachers. For all five standards, we identified opportunities for improvement, which are described in the report. For standards 1, we identified one partial shortcoming or inconsistency related to the verification and evaluation of student workloads: immediately after the evaluation visit, the institution addressed this issue regarding the undefined methodology for verifying study workloads in the Institution's Quality Rules and regarding the missing workload analysis in the self-evaluation report - after the visit the institution also changed the Rules of Procedure and the questionnaire and additionally explained that the changed procedure and questionnaire will be used in the next academic year (2022/2023).