University of Ljubljana

Univerza v Ljubljani

Basic information

  • Identifiers
    • DEQARINST2799
    • SI0001
    • ROR: https://ror.org/05njb9z20
    • SI-ETER.BAS.NATID: 33
    • Erasmus: SI LJUBLJA01

      • Erasmus Institution Code

      Identifier assigned by the European Commission to higher education institutions participating in the Erasmus+ programme - data harvested from ETER/OrgReg

      Read more...

    • SCHAC: uni-lj.si

      • SCHema for Academia

      Internet domain (DNS)-based identifier of institutions, used in several European initiatives for data exchange in the education and research sector, e.g. Emrex - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI API

      Read more...

    • Erasmus-Charter: E10209243

      • Erasmus Charter for Higher Education (ECHE)

      Application number related to the ECHE, required for higher education institutions participating in the Erasmus+ programme - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI API

      Read more...

    • EU-PIC: 999923240

      • Participant Identification Code (PIC)

      A PIC is assigned to legal entities participating in EU-funded programmes - data acquired using the European University Foundation (EUF) HEI API

      Read more...

    • EU-VAT: SI54162513

      • EU VAT number

      Identifier of economic operators for value-added tax (VAT) within the EU system, assigned by their national authority - data acquired using the EU participant register API

      Read more...

    • WHED: IAU-020664

      • IAU World Higher Education Database (WHED)

      Identifier used in the world-wide WHED database of higher education institutions, managed by the International Association of Universities (IAU) - data harvested from ETER/OrgReg

      Read more...

  • Provider type
    higher education institution
  • Legal seat(s)
    Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Further location(s)
    Postojna, Slovenia
    Ptuj, Slovenia
    Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia
    Nova Gorica, Slovenia
    Kranj, Slovenia
    Krško, Slovenia
    Črnomelj, Slovenia
    Portorož, Slovenia
    Murska Sobota, Slovenia
    Trbovlje, Slovenia
    Celje, Slovenia
  • Website
    https://www.uni-lj.si/eng/
  • Founding year
    1919
  • QF-EHEA levels
    third cycle, second cycle, first cycle, short cycle
  • Permalink
    https://data.deqar.eu/institution/2799

National External Quality Assurance Requirements

  • Accreditation of a study programme
    is granted for an indefinite period or the application is denied.
  • Re-accreditation of a higher education institution
    is granted for a period of maximum five years (or less) or, if quality standards are not meet the accreditation is denied.
  • Initial accreditation of a higher education institutions
    is granted for a period of five years or, if quality standards are not meet, the application is denied.
  • Accreditation of changes of higher education institutions
    Changes to another type, merger by acquisition, merger by the formation of a new entity or division of higher education institutions, changing the location in Slovenia
  • Further information on external quality assurance in Slovenia

External Quality Assurance Reports and Decisions

Filter reports

Clear all
Search programmes

Institutional level

This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional re-accreditation
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Institutional evaluation
Decision: positive
Institutional audit
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Institutional re-accreditation
Decision: positive
Institutional accreditation

Programme level

This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Buildings (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Civil Engineering (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • University Bachelor
  • Level
    first cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Civil Engineering (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Civil Engineering (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • University Bachelor
  • Level
    first cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Civil Engineering (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
Decision: positive
Civil Engineering (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Second cycle graduate
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
Decision: positive
Civil Engineering (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Second cycle graduate
  • Level
    second cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Construction Management (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Professional Bachelor
  • Level
    first cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report is not currently valid but part of the historic record.
Decision: positive
Construction Management (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Professional Bachelor
  • Level
    first cycle
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Češki jezik in književnost (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master
  • Level
    second cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Človek in medosebni odnosi (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • bachelor
  • Level
    first cycle (NQF 7)
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • DEQAR Report ID
    89501
  • Agency
    Slovenian Quality Assurance Agency (SQAA)
  • Type
    • Accreditation of new study programmes
  • Status
    part of obligatory EQA system
  • Formal decision
    positive
  • Date
    15/12/2022
  • Valid until
    not applicable
  • Summary

    Report summary

    The Faculty of Theology of the University of Ljubljana has proposed for accreditation the study programme Human and Interpersonal Relationships. The study programme is a redesigned program of the existing first cycle Bachelor's degree programme in Theological and Religious Studies. The programme has two study courses: Theological and Religious Studies and Marital and family therapy and counselling. The professional titles, depending on the field of study completed, are: Bachelor of Theological and Religious Studies (UN) and Bachelor of Family Counselling (UN). Bachelor's degree programme in Human and Interpersonal Relationships with a new study course Marital and Family Therapy and Counselling fills a gap in the study programme offer and provides the opportunity to acquire the necessary knowledge and skills to successful study in the second cycle of the Master's degree programme in Marital and Family Studies, which is already offered at the Faculty of Theology. The expert group highlighted three strengths and three opportunities.
    The Faculty of Theology of the University of Ljubljana has proposed for accreditation the study programme Human and Interpersonal Relationships. The study programme is a redesigned program of the existing first cycle Bachelor's degree programme in Theological and Religious Studies. The programme has two study courses: Theological and Religious Studies and Marital and family therapy and counselling...
  • Report and decision
  • Permalink
    https://data.deqar.eu/report/89501
  • Agency's identifier
    6033-9/2022/7
  • Verifiable Credential
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Človekove pravice in demokratizacija (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master
  • Level
    second cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Delovna terapija (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Bachelor (visokošolski)
  • Level
    first cycle (NQF 7. raven (7))
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
Part of the obligatory external QA system
Delovna terapija (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Bachelor
  • Level
    first cycle (NQF 7)
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
  • DEQAR Report ID
    135362
  • Agency
    Slovenian Quality Assurance Agency (SQAA)
  • Type
    • External (sample) evaluation of a study programme
  • Status
    part of obligatory EQA system
  • Formal decision
    not applicable
  • Date
    18/09/2025
  • Valid until
    not applicable
  • Summary

    Report summary

    As part of a sample evaluation of the undergraduate professional programme in Occupational Therapy offered by the University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Health Sciences (UL ZF), the expert panel found that the higher education institution meets the quality standards set out in the Criteria for accreditation and external evaluation of higher education institutions and study programmes. The evaluation confirmed that the programme is well developed in terms of content and internationally comparable, with clearly defined objectives, competences and learning outcomes. The institution has developed a comprehensive internal quality assurance system that involves all key stakeholders. The self-evaluation processes are regular, well documented and supported by data analyses. However, there is room for improvement in informing certain stakeholders (e.g. students and clinical mentors) about the results and follow-up of these analyses. The implementation of the programme is aligned with its objectives and competency outcomes. Teaching approaches are based on the concept of active learning and a strong integration of theory and practise. Clinical training is well organised and the tutor system works effectively. An important area for improvement is the need for a systematic review of timetables as the current structure has a negative impact on student workload and attendance. The institution regularly updates the curriculum in line with developments in the field and the guidelines of international professional organisations. New subjects have been introduced to address current challenges, such as climate change and early intervention. The positive assessment by the World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) confirms the developmental orientation of the programme. The structure of the teaching staff is interdisciplinary and professionally appropriate. However, research activity remains unevenly developed, particularly when comparing departments within the institution. Academic staff enjoy autonomy and have access to various forms of support and funding for professional development. An important indicator of the long-term sustainability of the programme is the active involvement of junior staff in doctoral studies, which supports generational renewal. In terms of communication, the institution utilises a wide range of channels, although it would be advisable to improve opportunities for anonymous feedback and present these options to students during induction sessions. The alumni community could also play a more active role in evaluation and programme development. The institution provides a stable and developmental environment that allows for quality delivery of the programme and sustainable development of the field of occupational therapy. The recommendations resulting from this evaluation provide a valuable opportunity for even more strategic planning for improvement, which is also suggested by the institution’s response to the expert panel’s report. The institution has outlined concrete and time-bound measures for most of the identified opportunities, addressing the majority of the panel’s recommendations.
    As part of a sample evaluation of the undergraduate professional programme in Occupational Therapy offered by the University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Health Sciences (UL ZF), the expert panel found that the higher education institution meets the quality standards set out in the Criteria for accreditation and external evaluation of higher education institutions and study programmes. The evaluation ...
  • Report and decision
  • Permalink
    https://data.deqar.eu/report/135362
  • Agency's identifier
    6034-41/2024/10
  • Verifiable Credential
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Denar in finance (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master
  • Level
    second cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Dentalna medicina (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
  • Level
    second cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
Part of the obligatory external QA system
Dentalna medicina (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master
  • Level
    second cycle (NQF 8)
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Digitalno jezikoslovje (second cycle degree)
  • Offered by
  • Qualification/award
    • Master
  • Level
    second cycle (NQF 8)
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Diplomacija (second cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Master
  • Level
    second cycle (NQF 8. raven (8))
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme
This report does not have a validity period, but it is older than 6 years and thus considered part of the historic record.
Part of the obligatory external QA system Decision: positive
Dizajn inženiring (first cycle degree)
  • Qualification/award
    • Bachelor (univerzitetni)
  • Level
    first cycle (NQF 7. raven (7))
  • Programme type
    Full recognised degree programme

Verifiable Credentials

A Verifiable Credential (VC) is a digitally-signed and thus tamper-evident document containing information on a subject (e.g. personal information, entitlements of an individual, degrees held by an individual or accreditation of a higher education institution). Quality assurance results recorded in DEQAR can be downloaded as W3C-compatible Verifiable Credentials.

Currently, two types of credentials can be issued:

EBSI Verifiable Accreditations (VA) can be used by a higher education institution in the context of the EBSI Early Adopters programme.

  • The VA allows the institution to prove its external quality assurance on the Trusted Issuer Registry (TIR). EBSI VAs are only issued for external quality assurance results with an official status in a national system (“part of obligatory EQA system”).
  • At present, the higher education institution’s EBSI DID needs to be communicated to EQAR and recorded in DEQAR manually at the moment. If you are a higher education institution participating in EBSI, please contact us to register your DID.
  • EBSI VAs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:ebsi:zk4bhCepWSYp9RhZkRPiwUL.

DEQAR Format Verifiable Credentials primarily serve as a proof of concept and public demonstrator currently.

  • DEQAR Format VCs are based on the plain W3C Recommendation and our own data model. While they closely follow the EBSI Schema, no EBSI-specific or EU-specific elements or data types are used.
  • The higher education institution is identified by its DEQAR URI in this case.
  • DEQAR Format VCs are issued by EQAR under its DID did:web:data.deqar.eu.

Please note: this is an experimental feature.